The Daily Spark

Want it delivered daily to your inbox?

  • AI Bubble Fueled by Zero Interest Rates

    Torsten Slok

    Apollo Chief Economist

    When the Fed started raising interest rates in March 2022, the Magnificent 7 stopped hiring more workers, see chart below.

    Why is the tech sector so vulnerable to higher interest rates? First, tech firms are priced to deliver cash flows far out in the future, which makes tech companies more vulnerable to changes in the discount rate. Second, tech firms often need to borrow to finance multi-year projects, which also makes them more vulnerable to higher interest rates. Third, when interest rates are high, general risk appetite among investors is low, as investors can generate higher returns in fixed income.

    The bottom line is that the bubble in AI valuations was simply the result of a long period with zero interest rates.

    With upward pressures on inflation coming from tariffs, deglobalization, and demographics, interest rates will remain high and continue to be a headwind to tech and growth for the coming years.

    Growth in total employment in Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla
    Sources: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Negative Impact of Tariffs on Earnings

    Torsten Slok

    Apollo Chief Economist

    While tariffs on China have declined from 145% to 30%, the headwind to corporate earnings from tariffs remains significant because of the overall jump in the average tariff rate from 3% in January to 18% today, see the first and second chart below. We are already beginning to see weakness in the economic data with a significant decline in the earnings revisions ratio since Liberation Day, see the third chart.

    Tariff timeline for the US-China trade war
    Sources: White House, China Ministry of Finance, Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist
    During the 2018 trade war with China, the average tariff rate went up from 2% to 3%. Today the average tariff rate is 18%.
    Note: Includes IEEPA tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China (with USMCA exemptions); April 2 “reciprocal” tariffs; and steel, aluminum, auto, and auto parts tariffs. Tariff revenue estimate uses an elasticity of -0.997 and a noncompliance rate of 8 percent. Sources: US Census Bureau; Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, Part II; US International Trade Commission, “U.S. imports for consumption, duties collected, and ratio of duties to values, 1891-2023, (Table 1)”; Tax Foundation calculations; Apollo Chief Economist
    Corporate earnings expectations deteriorating
    Note: Earnings revisions ratio measures how many upward revisions to earnings estimates analysts are making versus downward revisions over a given period. Above 0.5 more upgrades than downgrades and below 0.5 more downgrades than upgrades. Sources: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res charts

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Significant Headwinds to Consumer Spending

    Torsten Slok

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The Covid-motivated pause on reporting delinquent federal student loans has now ended. As a result, starting in May 2025, up to 10% of US households may face a steep decline in their credit score, see chart below. This means they will no longer be able to get a loan to buy a car, a house, or new furniture. Combined with tariffs and high uncertainty, this is a significant headwind to consumer spending over the coming months. See here for more discussion from the New York Fed.

    The pause on reporting delinquent federal student loans has ended
    Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • 10 Downside Risks to the US Economic Outlook

    Torsten Slok

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The trade war is making products more expensive at Walmart, student loan payments are restarting, and the Moody’s downgrade is pushing up borrowing costs for consumers and firms. The list of headwinds is growing, see below.

    10 Downside Risks to the US Economic Outlook
    Source: Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res image

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Indirect bidding in Treasury auctions refers to bids submitted on behalf of foreign institutions. These bidders don’t participate directly, but instead have their bids placed by intermediaries—hence “indirect.” Looking at foreign participation in 30-year Treasury auctions shows a downward trend in recent months, see chart below.

    30-year Treasury auctions: Foreign participation (indirect bidding) going down
    Sources: Bloomberg, Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Coming Energy Transition

    Torsten Slok

    Apollo Chief Economist

    US data centers are currently powered mainly by gas and coal. The IEA is forecasting that this will change over the coming years with renewables playing a much more significant role, see chart below.

    US data centers are currently powered mainly by gas and coal
    Sources: IEA, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • US Housing Outlook

    Torsten Slok

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Our updated housing chart book is available here.

    US Housing Outlook

    Download high-res chart book

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The latest IMF WEO forecast shows that Germany and France, over the coming years, will have bigger fiscal deficits than other EU countries, see chart below.

    IMF: Fiscal situation deteriorating in France and Germany
    Sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF), Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • When you buy a new t-shirt in Manhattan, some of the money goes to the manufacturer in China, and some of the money goes to the US company that sells the t-shirt.

    Looking at the distribution of expenditures on imports shows that for China, 56% of the money paid stays in the US, and 44% goes to China, see chart below.

    The bottom line is that more than half of the money paid for US imports from China stays in the US.

    For more discussion, see also here.

    More than half of expenditures on goods coming from China stays in the US
    Note: Chart shows how expenditures on imports are distributed between local content that stays in the US and the imported content that goes overseas to the trading partner. Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • A 10% Trade War Premium for the Dollar

    Torsten Slok

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Currencies normally move around with interest rate differentials. For example, when the Fed keeps interest rates higher for longer because of higher inflation, the US dollar goes up.

    Since the trade war started, this relationship has broken down. Now the dollar is driven by forces other than interest rate differentials, and the chart below suggests EURUSD should be trading closer to parity.

    In other words, the dollar is about 10% weaker than interest rate differentials would have suggested.

    Since the trade war started, EURUSD has been driven by other factors than interest rate differentials
    Note: 1-year yield differential = 1-year German government bill minus 1-year US T-bill. pp = percentage points. Sources: Bloomberg, Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.