• Apollo.com
  • Login
  • Register Now
light site-logo
  • The Academy
  • Upcoming Events
        • Upcoming Events

  • Learning Center
        • New & UpdatedAlternative Investing Course 2.0

        • Alternative Investing Essentials Part OnePrivate Equity, Venture Capital, Private Credit
        • Alternative Investing Essentials Part TwoReal Estate, Infrastructure, Digital Assets, Hedge Funds
        • Practical ConsiderationsAsset Allocation, Risk Considerations, Fund Structures, Fees
        • Introductory Videos

          View All Videos

        •  Recent Classes & Videos

        • • 2026 Outlook
        • • Private Equity’s Edge: Delivering Alpha in a Changing Market
        • • Powering Innovation: Infrastructure Investing Across the AI Value Chain
        • • Mid-Year Outlook: At the Crossroads of Stagflation — What’s Next?
        • • Hybrid Investments: Flexible Structures for Volatile Times
        • • Private Credit Investing in Volatile Times
        • View All Classes

  • Alternative Perspectives
        • Investment Knowledge
        • The View from Apollo
          • Investment Knowledge White Papers

            After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters

            February 27, 2026
          • The View From Apollo

            Allocation Insights: Asset-Backed Finance Is the Engine Behind Private Credit’s Next Chapter

            February 17, 2026
          • Investment Knowledge White Papers

            Private Equity Returns to Its Roots

            January 29, 2026
  • The Daily Spark
        • Read The Daily Spark Blog



        • Want it delivered daily to your inbox?
          • The Daily Spark

            Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets

            March 2, 2026
          • The Daily Spark

            Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years

            March 1, 2026
          • The Daily Spark

            Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace

            February 28, 2026
  • Register for Apollo Academy: Alternative Investing Course
  • Login
  • About Apollo Academy
  • Upcoming Events
  • Learning Center
  • Alternative Perspectives
  • The Daily Spark
  • Register for Apollo Academy: Alternative Investing Course
  • Login
  • Alternative Investing Course 2.0
  • 2026 Outlook
  • Private Equity’s Edge: Delivering Alpha in a Changing Market
  • Powering Innovation: Infrastructure Investing Across the AI Value Chain
  • Mid-Year Outlook: At the Crossroads of Stagflation — What’s Next?
  • Hybrid Investments: Flexible Structures for Volatile Times
  • Private Credit Investing in Volatile Times
  • View All Classes
  • Introductory Videos
  • Alternative Investing Essentials Part One • Now Available On Demand
  • Alternative Investing Essentials Part Two • Now Available On Demand
  • Practical Considerations • Now Available On Demand
  • Investment Knowledge
  • The View from Apollo
Home January 2026

The Average Effective Tariff Rate

Data from the Yale Budget Lab shows that the US average effective tariff rate is currently roughly half of the level seen in April 2025, see chart below.

US average effective tariff rate
Sources: The Budget Lab at Yale, Apollo Chief Economist

Download high-res chart

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

How AI-Related Funding Will Reshape Credit Markets

Training and running frontier AI models requires capital on a scale rarely seen in the private sector. Hyperscaler capex has already tripled since 2023, and forecasts now point to more than $2.7 trillion of cumulative AI-related spending from 2025 to 2029.

What began as a largely self-funded capex cycle is quickly becoming a financing event. In the final three months of 2025 alone, Oracle, Meta, Google and Amazon issued roughly $90 billion in bonds. As AI investment increasingly turns to debt markets, we expect this shift to meaningfully reorder the top ranks of the investment grade credit universe.

As the chart below illustrates, financing just 20% of AI capex through IG markets would materially reshape index composition — propelling Amazon into the top 3 issuers and pushing Meta, Microsoft, Oracle and Google into the top 10, with Google jumping from 67th to 8th.

This is one of the core themes explored in our 2026 Credit Outlook. In addition, we also highlight several forces reshaping credit markets:

  • Credit has shifted back into a buyer’s market. Economic growth in the US is expected to support corporate and consumer fundamentals in 2026. But the technical backdrop has flipped. After years of scarcity, credit markets are entering a higher supply regime driven by AI-related hyperscaler issuance and a reacceleration in M&A.
  • AI issuance is increasing concentration and correlation risk. AI-related exposure is becoming pervasive across portfolios, with apparent diversification across issuers and sectors increasingly masking a single macro bet on AI — raising correlation risk and increasing the value of diversification into areas structurally insulated from the AI arms race, including European private credit and sports financing.
  • M&A is returning at scale, reinforcing supply dynamics. Lower financing costs, workable valuations, abundant private equity dry powder, and a more supportive policy backdrop are driving a resurgence in deal activity, with large transactions tapping multiple segments of the credit markets simultaneously.
  • The cycle is defined by dispersion, not distress. Economic growth is narrowing rather than weakening, concentrating among higher-income consumers and large, AI-exposed corporates. This K-shaped environment is driving widening dispersion across credit markets, making selectivity paramount as dispersion — not defaults — creates opportunity.

Read more of our thinking and insights here.

How AI-related funding will reshape credit markets
Note: Assumes hyperscalers issue IG debt to fund 20% of BBG consensus capex 2026-2029, while rest of IG index grows at 5% / year. Data as of December 2025. Sources: Bloomberg, BofA

Download high-res chart

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

Private Equity Returns to Its Roots

How Back-to-Basics Value Creation Can Drive Alpha in 2026 and Beyond

Introduction: A Turning Point for Private Equity

Equity markets are entering a structurally different era. Public markets sit near record highs, driven by concentration, technical flows and negative equity risk premia — a tough starting point for future appreciation. Private equity, meanwhile, is confronting the end of a decade that ended in 2022 where cheap debt and multiple expansion could substitute for genuine value creation. Returns and realizations have predictably lagged after the interest rate reset in 2022.

In an easy‑money environment, many managers effectively subsisted on a “buy high, sell higher” strategy and generated less value from buying well and operational improvements.

The question for 2026 and beyond is not whether private equity will remain relevant, it is which strategy will excel in an environment that looks different than the recent past. The answer, we believe, lies in a return to the roots of the asset class: disciplined buying, hands-on operational improvement and clear, repeatable pathways to liquidity. These fundamentals were central to PE’s earliest successes but were lost sight of during periods of excess against an ultra-accommodative backdrop. We believe a return to fundamentals will define those strategies best positioned to outperform in a world with normalized rates.

In this article (the first in a series about the new private equity landscape), we explore how the asset class should return to its core principles to help deliver excess returns over public markets. These are the same principles that have historically driven returns in the private equity industry, except for the 2010–2022 period.

The Market Backdrop: Public and Private Equity at a Crossroads

On the surface, public equity markets appear healthy. In reality, these markets are defined by a shrinking opportunity set, narrow leadership and returns driven by the reflexivity of index investing, which pushes up the valuation of the largest companies:

  • The number of public companies has been cut in half over two decades, shrinking the investable universe.
  • Each year, more companies are removed from the public markets than are added.
  • The top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 represent 40% of the benchmark’s market cap, a historic high.
  • Passive flows dominate price action, amplifying crowding and reducing the role of fundamentals.
  • The vast majority of public equity fund managers have struggled to outperform their benchmarks.
Public Markets Are Facing Structural Challenges
Sources: World Federation of Exchanges, World Bank, as of August 2025. 2. Sources: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist, as of December 2025.
Passive Flows Are Dominating Price Action and Crowding Markets
Note: Reflects BI ETF data on a cumulative basis from 2012 through Q3 2024.
Sources: Bloomberg, Russell and S&P

These are not cyclical quirks but long‑term secular trends away from active management and towards index investing. While indexation has benefited investors with lower costs, it has also distorted price discovery and fundamental valuation.

Private equity investing has changed just as dramatically. A decade of ultra‑low rates allowed many managers to rely on expanding multiples, cheap leverage and buoyant exit markets. We believe that era has ended. Higher financing costs, slower exits and a recalibration of pricing power have revealed which managers depended on beta versus those whose returns stem from operational value creation, along with shrewd asset sourcing and selection. In that environment, financial engineering often played a larger role in driving returns than hands‑on operational improvement. A carve‑out, a strategy in which an underperforming business is separated from a parent company and repositioned as a standalone enterprise, historically exemplified the asset class’s operational roots. As financing costs have risen, exit markets have slowed and pricing power has recalibrated, the distinction between managers who generate returns through operational value creation and those more reliant on favorable market conditions has become increasingly apparent.

“The next 10 years will look significantly different from the last 15 — an era buttressed by a zero-interest-rate policy and multiple expansion.”

Bain & Company, Global Private Equity Report 2025

Going forward, can private equity get back to the fundamentals that made investing in the space different and value-additive? Traditionally, private equity emphasized long-term value creation and operational efficiency improvements outside the constraints of quarterly public market reporting and short-term performance pressures.

The Myth of the Last Cycle: Why Many Managers Are Struggling

One fact captures today’s challenge: since 2018, capital calls have exceeded distributions by roughly $1.5 trillion.1 The effects are clear: exits are slow, DPI is depressed and fund lives are stretching significantly beyond the expected 10-year terms, dragging down IRRs.

These pressures reveal structural weaknesses in the industry:

  • Overreliance on leverage and rising multiples
    From 2010–2021, approximately 66% of value creation came from leverage and multiple expansion, factors beyond a manager’s control and thus beta.2 High entry prices and aggressive capital structures worked, until rates normalized.
  • Constrained exits and misaligned pricing expectations
    Buyers can underwrite less leverage; sellers are still anchored to peak-cycle valuations. The bid–ask gap has frozen deal-making and extended hold periods, as managers with unrealistic valuation expectations are forced to hold assets longer to grow into target return multiples.
  • Lack of true exits
    Many firms are leaning into continuation vehicles, secondaries and hybrid structures to engineer liquidity rather than generate it through fundamental value creation.

These challenges are not temporary. They are symptoms of a regime shift, one that exposes managers without a true value creation engine. The dispersion between top and bottom quartile funds now exceeds 25 percentage points — a sign that private equity is no longer a rising-tide-lifts-all-boats industry.3

A Winning Strategy Today Resembles the Past

In our view, the firms that will outperform in 2026 and beyond will do so by reclaiming the practices that defined private equity’s foundational decades: buy well, control the controllable, make fundamental improvements to a business and look to return capital early and often.

A Repeatable Playbook for Value Creation
For illustrative purposes only.

Buy Intelligently

Purchase price is once again the dominant driver of returns. Managers often succeeding today share several traits:

  • They source complex, bilateral or off-cycle opportunities where competition is limited.
  • They avoid overpaying for assets. Purchase price matters. It has a significant impact on how long it takes to exit an investment, and the value ultimately realized at exit. This
    relationship is illustrated in the Daily Spark, “Buy Low, Sell High Is a Superior Strategy,” by Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok, and in the chart below.
  • They use leverage prudently to preserve interest coverage
    ratios and enhance free cash flow.

In an environment where valuations remain high and debt is more expensive, disciplined buying is not defensive, it is alpha.

Build Through Operational Value Creation

Cheap leverage can no longer mask a weak value creation capability. Leading managers distinguish themselves by how they operate:

  • Develop detailed value creation plans upfront.
  • Deploy operating teams focused on speed of execution and purpose-built to deliver on the investment thesis.
  • Use M&A selectively to build scale and strengthen competitive positions.
  • Actively manage capital structures to support growth, preserve downside protection and return capital early.
Buy Low, Sell High Is an Effective Strategy
Data as of September 2025. Sources: PitchBook, Apollo Chief Economist
Flexibility Is Key to Liquidity
For illustrative purposes only.

Exit with Flexibility and Focus

While there has been some recovery in private equity exit activity, volumes remain well below five-year averages.4 Even if exit volumes normalize, the backlog of assets needing to be sold is so significant that distribution yields, as a percentage of assets held, are unlikely to normalize as well. In a constrained exit environment, liquidity becomes a strategic capability. Leading firms typically approach exits with discipline and flexibility:

  • Underwrite multiple exit paths from day one.
  • Pursue early capital return where possible via minority sales, dividends where leverage levels can be maintained and creative opportunities to arbitrage entry multiples (e.g., sale and leasebacks).
  • Look to drive returns from fundamentally improving a business rather than counting on high multiples. Lower dependence on multiple expansion provides greater exit optionality.

Firms generating strong DPI today are distinguished not by perfect market timing but by flexible, multi-channel liquidity strategies.

Conclusion: The Future of PE Belongs to Those Who Reclaim Its Past

Private equity stands at an inflection point. We believe the era of easy money has ended, and with it the illusion that overly simple strategies like buying good companies at any price can reliably deliver alpha. Over time, private equity has distinguished itself from public markets through active ownership and long-term value creation, often in environments far less accommodating than the one that just passed. Private equity has a way of reinventing itself and, this time, that reinvention is just a return to fundamentals and the original promise of the asset class: to buy intelligently, improve relentlessly and return capital through disciplined, flexible execution.

The managers we believe will outperform in 2026 and beyond will not be the ones chasing beta or momentum. They will be those returning to the craft: the builders, the operators and the investors for whom value creation is not a buzzword but a repeatable system.

Private equity’s path forward is not new. It is a return to its roots.

DOWNLOAD THE ARTICLE

1 Source: Morgan Stanley Research. Digging into the DPI Drought. June 2025.

2 Source: McKinsey Global Private Markets Review 2024. Represents total return for buyout deals that were entered in 2010 or later and exited in 2021 or before.

3 Note: Private equity includes buyout, growth/expansion, diversified and turnaround funds across vintage years from 2005-2019. Data (20-year IRRs) as of December 31, 2024. Source: Preqin

4 Source: Bain & Company Global Private Equity Report 2025


The information herein is provided for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or investment advice, nor should any information in this document be relied on when making an investment decision. Opinions and views expressed reflect the current opinions and views of the authors and Apollo Analysts as of the date hereof and are subject to change. Please see the end of this document for important disclosure information.


Important Disclosure Information

This presentation is for educational purposes only and should not be treated as research. This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are the views and opinions of the author(s) of the White Paper. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Further, Apollo and its affiliates may have positions (long or short) or engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and views expressed in this presentation. There can be no assurance that an investment strategy will be successful. Historic market trends are not reliable indicators of actual future market behavior or future performance of any particular investment which may differ materially, and should not be relied upon as such. Target allocations contained herein are subject to change. There is no assurance that the target allocations will be achieved, and actual allocations may be significantly different than that shown here. This presentation does not constitute an offer of any service or product of Apollo. It is not an invitation by or on behalf of Apollo to any person to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy, and shall not form the basis of, nor may it accompany nor form part of, any right or contract to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Nothing herein should be taken as investment advice or a recommendation to enter into any transaction.

Hyperlinks to third-party websites in this presentation are provided for reader convenience only. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed herein will continue. Unless otherwise noted, information included herein is presented as of the dates indicated. This presentation is not complete and the information contained herein may change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update the presentation to account for such changes. Apollo has not made any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to fairness, correctness, accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the information contained herein, and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability therefore. The information contained herein is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information contained herein, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients.

Certain information contained herein may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such information. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 largest U.S. publicly traded companies by market value.

Additional information may be available upon request.

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

Why Is Job Growth Weaker in Small Businesses?

Employment growth in large companies is outpacing job growth in smaller companies.

The source of the underperformance of small businesses could be AI or it could be the trade war.

Cumulative change in employment since Jan. 2024
Sources: Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP), Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist

Download high-res chart

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

Quantifying the Productivity Gains from AI

Academic papers are inconclusive about the impact of AI on productivity, but we believe we are in the early stages of a boom in labor productivity, see charts below and our chart book (available here). While there are questions about the magnitude of the impact at the macro level, it is clear that there are already significant sector impacts including in DevOps software, robotic process automation and content management systems.

We are likely in the early stages of another productivity boom
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist
Academic studies inconclusive about the impact of AI on productivity
Source: Apollo Chief Economist

Download high-res chart book

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

Understanding Demand for Treasuries and Why the Yield Curve Is Steepening

This chart book looks at demand and supply in the Treasury market, including recent developments in Treasury auction metrics. There are 10 conclusions:

1. For every $5 the government collects in taxes, a dollar goes to paying interest on debt.

2. $10 trillion of government debt will mature over the next year, which is 33% of all debt outstanding.

3. The share of T-bills outstanding has increased to 22%, and 85% of Treasury gross issuance is T-bills.

4. The average federal net interest expense per day, including weekends, is now $3.5 billion.

5. Foreign ownership of Treasuries has declined to 25% of the total outstanding, down from 33% a decade ago.

6. Japan has been increasing its holdings of Treasuries while China has been lowering its holdings.

7. In Treasury auctions, tails and stop-through have been small and relatively balanced, implying that there is still solid demand across the curve.

8. Treasury auction metrics show that indirect bidding, often a proxy for foreign central bank demand, has been declining over the past year, particularly for notes.

9. The Fed cutting interest rates has not lowered inflows into money market funds, implying that “money on the sidelines” is not as interest rate sensitive as many people think.

10. 89% of US government debt is fixed rate, and 22% of debt outstanding is in bills.

$10trn of government debt will mature over the next year, which is 33% of all debt outstanding
Sources: US Department of Treasury, Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist
The Fed cutting interest rates has not lowered inflows into money market funds
Sources: Investment Company Institute (ICI), Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist

Download high-res chart book

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

Convergence: Insights on Fixed Income Replacement

In this article, Apollo Partner Brian Weinstein kicks off Convergence, a new series exploring the convergence of public and private credit markets and its potential implications for the future of fixed income portfolio construction.

Key Takeaways:

  • Traditional fixed income portfolios are being reshaped by structural shifts in liquidity, regulation and investor needs.
  • Certain segments of public credit markets have become more liquid but less differentiated: spreads are compressed, benchmarks are highly concentrated and the scope for active alpha has become limited.
  • Meanwhile, private credit, once synonymous with middle-market direct lending, has evolved into an estimated $40 trillion global market, the majority of which is investment grade.
  • In this new environment, the integration of public and private credit—the fixed income replacement framework—can enhance return potential, improve portfolio efficiency and align liquidity with investors’ long-term objectives.
Download the Article
Listen to the Podcast

The information herein is provided for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or investment advice, nor should any information in this document be relied on when making an investment decision. Opinions and views expressed reflect the current opinions and views of the authors and Apollo Analysts as of the date hereof and are subject to change. Please see the end of this document for important disclosure information.


Important Disclosure Information

This presentation is for educational purposes only and should not be treated as research. This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are the views and opinions of the author(s) of the White Paper. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Further, Apollo and its affiliates may have positions (long or short) or engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and views expressed in this presentation. There can be no assurance that an investment strategy will be successful. Historic market trends are not reliable indicators of actual future market behavior or future performance of any particular investment which may differ materially, and should not be relied upon as such. Target allocations contained herein are subject to change. There is no assurance that the target allocations will be achieved, and actual allocations may be significantly different than that shown here. This presentation does not constitute an offer of any service or product of Apollo. It is not an invitation by or on behalf of Apollo to any person to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy, and shall not form the basis of, nor may it accompany nor form part of, any right or contract to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Nothing herein should be taken as investment advice or a recommendation to enter into any transaction.

Hyperlinks to third-party websites in this presentation are provided for reader convenience only. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed herein will continue. Unless otherwise noted, information included herein is presented as of the dates indicated. This presentation is not complete and the information contained herein may change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update the presentation to account for such changes. Apollo has not made any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to fairness, correctness, accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the information contained herein, and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability therefore. The information contained herein is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information contained herein, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients.

Certain information contained herein may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such information. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 largest U.S. publicly traded companies by market value.

Additional information may be available upon request.

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

After 60/40: Modern Portfolio Allocation Across Private and Public Markets

Model Portfolios Need a Modern Makeover

Public markets now represent a shrinking slice of the real economy. So why do most model portfolios still look the same? In this new Apollo series, we explore how private markets can help enhance portfolio outcomes, using historical data and insights to reveal their potential impact in shifting the efficient frontier.

Traditional Portfolios Haven’t Kept Up with the Changing Economy

For decades, the 60/40 portfolio allocation model has been top-of-mind for long-term investors. This mix of public equities and fixed income was designed to balance growth and stability and provide the diversification benefits of assets with low correlation to each other. However, as more lending and credit creation take place in private markets, the traditional 60/40 model is becoming outdated. Now, a handful of mega-cap stocks drive public equity returns, while the rising correlation between public stocks and bonds has practically eroded the diversification benefits of the traditional 60/40 portfolio, leaving investors more exposed to systemic risks.

Public Markets Are Shrinking

Sources: (Top) World Federation of Exchanges, World Bank as of June 30, 2025. Represents companies in the United States, Europe and Asia with LTM revenues greater than $100 million. (Bottom) WFE, PitchBook and World Bank as of December 2024.

Allocations to Private Markets Can Help Improve Outcomes

We believe the strategic inclusion of private markets is the next evolution of model portfolios. Our analysis shows that by incorporating private market investments, model portfolios have the potential to demonstrate improved risk-adjusted outcomes and diversification benefits all the while meeting a range of investment goals. From 4Q06 to 2Q25, a traditional 60/40 portfolio of public stocks and bonds returned just 7.3% on an annualized basis. Adding private markets to this 60/40 portfolio incrementally increased returns and lowered risk over this same time period, with a portfolio of 100% private markets delivering a 10.3% annualized return.

Shifting the Efficient Frontier with Private Markets

For illustrative purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The returns referenced above do not reflect any actual portfolio. Diversification does not ensure or protect against loss. This analysis uses indices from 4Q 2006 to 2Q 2025 (rebalanced quarterly). Public Equities include S&P 500, Russell 2000, and MSCI ACWI ex-US IMI. Public Bonds include Bloomberg US Aggregate Index, Bloomberg Corporate High Yield, and Morningstar LSTA Levered Loan Index. Private Markets include Preqin Private Equity, Preqin Secondaries , Preqin Infrastructure, Preqin Real Estate, Preqin Private Debt, and Cliffwater CDLI. Nothing herein is intended to imply that investments in private markets are considered “conservative,” “safe,” “risk free,” or “risk averse.” Please see the disclosures at the end of this document for more information about the model portfolio methodology
DOWNLOAD THE ARTICLE

The information herein is provided for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or investment advice, nor should any information in this document be relied on when making an investment decision. Opinions and views expressed reflect the current opinions and views of the authors and Apollo Analysts as of the date hereof and are subject to change. Please see the end of this document for important disclosure information.


Important Disclosure Information

This presentation is for educational purposes only and should not be treated as research. This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are the views and opinions of the author(s) of the White Paper. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Further, Apollo and its affiliates may have positions (long or short) or engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and views expressed in this presentation. There can be no assurance that an investment strategy will be successful. Historic market trends are not reliable indicators of actual future market behavior or future performance of any particular investment which may differ materially, and should not be relied upon as such. Target allocations contained herein are subject to change. There is no assurance that the target allocations will be achieved, and actual allocations may be significantly different than that shown here. This presentation does not constitute an offer of any service or product of Apollo. It is not an invitation by or on behalf of Apollo to any person to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy, and shall not form the basis of, nor may it accompany nor form part of, any right or contract to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Nothing herein should be taken as investment advice or a recommendation to enter into any transaction.

Hyperlinks to third-party websites in this presentation are provided for reader convenience only. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed herein will continue. Unless otherwise noted, information included herein is presented as of the dates indicated. This presentation is not complete and the information contained herein may change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update the presentation to account for such changes. Apollo has not made any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to fairness, correctness, accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the information contained herein, and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability therefore. The information contained herein is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information contained herein, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients.

Certain information contained herein may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such information. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 largest U.S. publicly traded companies by market value.

Additional information may be available upon request.

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

Daily and Weekly Data for the US Economy

We have updated our chart book with daily and weekly indicators, and the latest data shows that:

1. There is a capex boom underway, and corporate capex plans are moving higher driven by the One Big Beautiful Bill.

2. Daily data for job postings are rising.

3. Withheld income taxes are at higher levels than normal in January.

4. Weekly data for Broadway show attendance is also at higher levels than normally seen in January.

5. Weekly data for Redbook same-store retail sales continue to show solid growth in consumer spending.

The bottom line is that the US economy continues to perform well.

Capex boom started once trade war uncertainty abated
Sources: National Federation of Independent Business, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Business Roundtable,
Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist
Daily jobs postings
Sources: Indeed, Bloomberg, Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist
Weekly data for same-store retail sales
Sources: Redbook Research Inc., Macrobond, Apollo Chief Economist

Download high-res chart book

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

S&P 500 Margin Expansion All Coming from Tech

Operating margin measures the share of revenue left after covering operating expenses such as wages, materials and overhead. The chart below shows that over the past 20 years, all of the increase in the S&P 500’s operating margin has come from tech‑related sectors, while operating margins for non‑tech companies have stayed near 9%.

S&P 500 profit margin expansion coming from tech companies
Note: Tech related includes communication services, consumer discretionary and information technology. Sources: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

Download high-res chart

Recent Posts

  • Strong Net Foreign Buying of US Assets
  • Average Tenure of Companies in the S&P 500 Index: 15 Years
  • Fed Pricing Reveals Market Expectations About the AI Adoption Pace
  • After 60/40: In Private Markets, Manager Selection Matters
  • Equity Market Trading Volumes Rising

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

Categories

  • Apollo Answers
  • Course Introductions
  • Economic Intelligence
  • Hide from Wordpress Search
  • Investment Knowledge
  • Perspectives
  • Redirecting
  • The Daily Spark
  • The View from Apollo
  • The Weekly Brief
  • Uncategorized
  • White Papers

Posts navigation

Page 1 Page 2 … Page 4 Next page→
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Forward-Looking Statements
Apollo
© Apollo Global Management, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The Apollo Academy is for informational and educational purposes only and nothing contained herein should be taken as investment advice or a recommendation to enter into any transaction. They are not an invitation by or on behalf of Apollo to any person to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy, and shall not form the basis of, nor may it accompany nor form part of, any right or contract to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this website will come to pass. For additional information, please see the disclaimers included in each piece of content or the legal page of our website here.